Resources

Client Alerts, News Articles, Blog Posts, & Multimedia

Everything you need to know about BMD and the industry.

Changing Employers? Keep Your Tail Covered!

News Article

A common question regarding employment, and particularly changes in employment, revolves around the idea of tail insurance coverage.  As such, this issue’s legal column explores what tail coverage is, why you need it, and who pays for it.

In general, there are two types of medical malpractice insurance policies: (1) claims made policies and (2) occurrence policies.  If an advanced practice nurse (“APN”) has a “claims made policy,” this means that the insurance will cover any claims that are made against the APN while that policy is in effect.  However, it will not cover claims that are made after the policy is terminated (i.e. the APN moves to a new practice or the practice changes carriers).  Anyone with a “claims made” policy should purchase a “tail” policy to be effective once the original policy ends.  The tail policy will extend insurance coverage for a set amount of time in order to protect the APN against lawsuits that may be brought at a later date even though the original policy is no longer in effect.  This tail should be purchased regardless of specialty.  In general, it is best to negotiate who is responsible for purchasing the tail before entering into an employment agreement.  Otherwise, the APN will likely hold full responsibility for purchasing the tail, unless his/her new employer will purchase it or a severance package can be negotiated with the former employer that includes tail coverage.

If an APN has an “occurrence policy,” this means that the insurance will cover any claims made against the APN for incidents that occurred while the policy was in place.  (A lawsuit will still be covered after the policy ends, so long as the actual incident at issue occurred while the policy was in effect.)  In this case, there is no need to purchase a tail policy, because the occurrence policy will continue to protect the APN for incidents that happened while the policy was in place.  This type of policy is becoming rare.  Most places now carry a “claims made” policy, but there are a few “occurrence policies” still used.

SHORT ANSWER:  Anyone coming off of a “claims made policy” should purchase a tail.

STRATEGIC TIP:  It is best to negotiate who will buy the tail during employment contract negotiations before employment even commences.  There are many ways this can be structured.

Article by Jeana M. Singleton taken from the OAAPN Newsletter Challenge, September 2009


Recent Litigation Challenges the Affordable Care Act Preventive Services Requirement

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been met with numerous legal challenges. The most recent legal challenge, Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra, could affect millions of people covered by private health insurance.

BMD’s Director of Marketing Jennifer Shankleton Elected as President of the LMA Midwest Region for 2023

Congratulations to Jennifer Shankleton, BMD’s Director of Marketing, on her recent election to President of the Legal Marketing Association (LMA) Midwest Region for 2023!  LMA is a premier professional association focused on empowering marketing, business development, and client service professionals.

Brennan Manna & Diamond Attorneys Featured in The Best Lawyers in America© and Ones to Watch™ 2023 Report

Brennan Manna & Diamond (BMD) is pleased to announce 17 BMD attorneys have been voted by their peers as The Best Lawyers in America© and Ones to Watch in America™.

Physician Non-Competition Agreements 2022

Contract provisions with restrictions on physicians practicing in the same area should they change employment have been around for decades. In Ohio, courts continue to state that while provisions are generally disfavored, non-competition provisions remain enforceable. Specifically, as to physician non-competes, the courts note that such agreements are further scrutinized regarding the adverse effect on the public interest to keep healthcare professionals in a community. Courts have continued in more cases than not to enforce restrictive covenants against physicians.

Immigration Attorney Talks Crisis in Ukraine (published by Community Legal Aid, 4/6/22)

Duriya Dhinojwala interview with Community Legal Aid